Health Plans Are Missing Out on Revenue and Cost Savings by Overlooking the Strategic Importance of Complaints, Appeals and Grievances

May 16, 2022

Inspire Innovations launches Compliant A&G 7.0 (CAG) a proven solution that reduces the costs of Complaints, Appeals and Grievances, lowers complaint rates and most importantly, helps improve top line growth.


Inspire Innovations Logo

Inspire Innovations Logo for Complaints, Appeals and Grievance Press Release

BOULDER, Colo. - May 16, 2022 - (Newswire.com)

Inspire Innovations, a consulting and software firm and member of the Managed Care Resource Alliance (MCRA) group today announced the Launch of Compliant A&G (CAG) Version 7.0. CAG is a next generation Complaints, Appeals and Grievances cloud based service that has been proven to reduce CAG departmental costs by as much as 40% and lower complaint rates while driving enterprise-wide operational improvements that impact top line growth. CAG's Case Management module streamlines complaint handling, reduces costs, enforces compliance, and ensures plans achieve top performance ratings in Appeals & Grievance processing. CAG's powerful Analytics have been further enhanced in 7.0 to supply insights for a surprisingly wide range of strategic decisions that can impact both bottom and top-line revenues. 

"Operational issues not only drive-up costs and cause compliance issues, but they also impede growth," said Daniele Chenal, Director of Healthcare at Inspire Innovations. "But perhaps more importantly, Health Plans are missing out on leveraging their Complaints, Appeals and Grievance data to identify and prioritize enterprise-wide operational improvements. By mining this data, we are helping health plans gain critical insights into their operations. The outcome includes optimized benefit design, focused areas for provider and member education and improved internal operations. These improvements reduce member and provider abrasion, lead to better Provider and Member experiences which aid in retention and enrollment."

CAG 7.0 enhancements and benefits include: 

  • Rapid and accurate case resolution. Proven to streamline case handling enhancements have been made to simplify application navigation and improve data-validation.
  • Actionable Analytics. Additional data visualizations improve root causes analysis and easy navigation make Analytics accessible to all users.
  • Enforced Compliance.  Enhanced business rules ensure continuous compliance. Updated ODAG-CDAG protocols provide accurate CMS compliance reporting.
  • Delegate Management. CAG Outreach facilitates seamless collaboration with external parties enabling SLA management and faster information turn-around time.
  • Guaranteed Security: Hi-Trust certified cloud-based software as a service deployed on cutting-edge technology standards.

The CAG solution can be implemented rapidly by our solutions team and our compliance services ensure our clients have the continuous support they need to meet changing regulatory requirements. CAG 7.0's robust rules engine meets the needs of all lines of business for both Provider and Member cases including the most rigorous rules of Medicare Advantage. That means that customers get the same comprehensive set of capabilities that have proven so cost effective through multiple product generations: complete Intake through resolution case handling; full reporting and complete member correspondence generation and management.

"With the Medicare Advantage market set to double by 2030, health plans with 4+ Star Ratings stand to win more new Medicare enrollments and subsequent government spending," said Aaron Novell, Product Manager at Inspire Innovations. "Solutions like CAG that can directly improve administration as well as member and provider experience (now weighted even more heavily for CMS Stars) should be top priorities for Medicare Advantage plans."

You can learn more about CAG 7.0 by visiting our product page at www.compliantag.com. or reading a Complaints, Appeals and Grievances Case Study. 

Inspire Innovations currently works with some of the world's most successful healthcare and insurance companies to help them achieve their transformational objectives. For more information, visit www.inspireinnovations.com  




Press Release Service by Newswire.com

Original Source: Health Plans Are Missing Out on Revenue and Cost Savings by Overlooking the Strategic Importance of Complaints, Appeals and Grievances

More News

Why Democrats are pivoting to thirst traps

Oct 26, 2026

Why Democrats are pivoting to thirst traps

“It is a very real dynamic that you could have all these videos about Jon Ossoff, and it's not seen as detracting away from his overall message or his seriousness as a politician,” The 19th’s Grace Panetta said on Vox’s Today, Explained podcast. | Elijah Nouvelage/Getty Images Democrats have been emphasizing lots of issues in the runup to the 2026 midterms: The Iran war. The state of the economy and healthcare. Corruption. And…hotness. Specifically, their candidates: The internet is awash in clips of Michigan candidate Abdul El-Sayed pumping iron and podcasters proclaiming that “America deserves a hot president” in a video interspersed with photos of Georgia Sen. Jon Ossoff. Having a good-looking candidate is by no means a new tactic — famously, it may have helped John F. Kennedy win election over Richard Nixon — but the online left is adapting that strategy for the internet and fandom age.  Grace Panetta, a politics reporter for The 19th, wrote about how “thirst edits” of Ossoff in particular are proliferating online. Panetta says the organic origins of a lot of these videos are of particular interest to Democratic operatives, who see it as a way to gain back ground they lost on the internet after the 2024 election.  Panetta spoke with Today, Explained co-host Sean Rameswaram about who’s thirsting over Democratic politicians in the first place, how 2026’s hot candidates are different from those of yore, and whether it’s actually giving them a boost.  Below is an excerpt of their conversation, edited for length and clarity. There’s much more in the full podcast, so listen to Today, Explained wherever you get your podcasts, including Apple Podcasts, Pandora, and Spotify. Where are these edits coming from? Regular online creators. And it’s important to note at the outset that these are not paid partnerships. The campaign is not paying these influencers to make edits about how they think their candidate’s really attractive.  That’s partly why I wanted to dig into it, because it’s organic. These are just online creators wanting to draw visibility and attention to a candidate that they really like. Jon Ossoff is currently running for reelection in these midterms. How do we know for sure that he isn’t somehow behind the campaign? I spoke to several creators who make these videos and they said that they’re doing it for the love of the game and they’re just supporters. His campaign did not give me a quote or a statement for this story. So it’s fair to assume that he’s not directly involved and he doesn’t repost these videos.  But as people pointed out to me, his campaign knows that they have an attractive, compelling candidate. And they’ve previously been vaunted for their digital strategy this cycle of putting out very high-quality livestreams of his rallies. There’s a lot of material for an enterprising TikToker who wants to make these edits or clips. They have a lot to work with.  His campaign, as one person put it, is definitely playing into that, but not directly engaging. It’s a fine line to walk. Is it just an Ossoff thing or is this going on with other candidates? I do recall that Abdul El-Sayed hits the gym. Famously so. Yes, he hits the gym. I just watched so many videos for this story. I also came across a fair number of Gavin Newsom edits. There are people who think he gives sort of a Patrick Bateman, American Psycho vibe. There are also official Democratic accounts, including the TikTok account for the DNC, the headquarters account, which was formerly Kamala HQ, who have been posting edits of Ossoff and also Abdul El-Sayed, who kind of leans into this gym-bro persona.  The headquarters account posted a side-by-side of Ossoff and Abdul El-Sayed with the caption, “There are 69 days until election day.” Nice. Yes. There are also lots of edits of Mamdani, and former President Barack Obama. Obama nostalgia content goes hard on the internet. So you’re seeing these more official side Democratic campaign accounts leaning into it and playing up their candidates. Having an attractive candidate is nothing new. You mentioned Obama. JFK was famously dashing. What feels different about what you’re seeing now on social media? I think this is really a culmination of a lot of different things happening right now in politics and specifically within the Democratic Party.  After their loss in 2024, there was a lot of conversation about the gerontocracy, how we’re governed by a lot of really old people, for the most part, in this century. And also about Democrats’ digital strategy and the aftermath of 2024.  One thing that a lot of people in that digital space have been talking about is how Republicans and the Trump campaign really capitalized on getting that organic engagement on platforms like TikTok and Instagram, where a lot of Americans are now going to get at least some of their news, and also engaging with and encouraging the creation of this kind of organic content on platforms and from creators that are not always expressly political or official-side.  “A candidate’s messaging strategy is only as good as the content and only if it meets people where they are and actually speaks to a real need people have.” As one Democrat I talked to put it, she thinks it’s a way for Democrats to win back the internet and to really create a contrast with the Republicans. And she said to have fun on the internet because Republicans are having fun on the internet and it appears to be working for them, or at least it was in 2024. Is there something about this being something on the left that makes it sort of tricky? This is, broadly speaking, objectification, right? It is a fine line between thirst and objectification. And there is also a gendered element to it that it is mostly men that these types of videos are being made about.  Now, granted, a lot of people make sort of hype edits or positive content about AOC because she’s a very popular female politician on the left, but it’s true that women candidates are held to higher standards in terms of how they present themselves and how their supporters portray them.  It is a very real dynamic that you could have all these videos about Jon Ossoff, and it’s not seen as detracting away from his overall message or his seriousness as a politician. Is there a drawback of focusing on looks? Does it make the Democratic Party or these candidates seem superficial or not that serious? President Trump has been the defining figure in our politics for 10 years now. And he is famously very, very image focused and image obsessed. We live in a very image-obsessed society, and I think there’s kind of a bipartisan acknowledgement of that.  And looks matter to people in all kinds of ways. They do matter in politics, they do matter to voters. Whether you like that that’s the case or not, it is the reality. And I think the way that a lot of people on the left see this is, people want to look at attractive people. People take attractive people more seriously and are more willing to listen to them. So we should play into that and play that up.  That’s also been the case on the right. President Trump famously loves people out of “central casting.” There’s been this whole movement on the right about making conservatism sexy again. And especially at the beginning of the second Trump term, you had all these influencers talking about how the second Trump term was going to usher in this great age of hotness, which is of course very based on sort of stereotypical male-centered Eurocentric beauty standards.  I think the genie’s out of the bottle on this one in terms of the fact that our politics and society is very image-obsessed. And I think the left, being locked out of power, realizes they have to play on those terms and they have fun doing it. You could look at it as giving “Kamala is brat,” which famously did not work. Is it working in any tangible way for Ossoff, for Abdul El-Sayed, or anyone else? I think a lot of the time in politics, the success of a message is really dependent on the broader political situation. I think a part of the reason that the Kamala’s brat thing didn’t work is people were like, “Okay, that’s great, but my gas is too expensive and prices are too high and I’m not happy with how things have gone under the Biden administration, so I don’t really care.” I don’t know that specific digital strategy makes or breaks a campaign or candidate, but it feeds into a bunch of larger factors.  Something that a lot of people I spoke to said they liked about Jon Ossoff is how he is incredibly serious in Senate hearings. He doesn’t grandstand. He really holds Trump administration officials’ feet to the fire. He’s been very focused in his role in the Senate and on the campaign trail about calling out corruption. He’s a very, very gifted speaker and orator. So I think a candidate’s messaging strategy is only as good as the content and only if it meets people where they are and actually speaks to a real need people have. And I think people are really unhappy with the second Trump term and politicians being super old and out of touch, and it’s a perfect storm of factors that makes it work for him.

YOUR NEWS, OUR NETWORK.

Do you have Great News you want to tell the world?

Be it updates about your business or your community, you can make sure that it’s heard by submitting your story to our network reaching hundreds of news sites across 6 verticals.

The Daily Feeder

A leading news network dedicated to keeping you up-to-date on the world's most important political, business, and cultural news into a three-minute read.

NEWSLETTER